An excellent article, leading to the right conclusions I think.
White nations (if not our current nation-states) have much in common, but that doesn’t mean we’re prime candidates for an empire dominated by any one of us.
A world of nations is a positive vision; one in which white nations retain full sovereignty, but cooperate in a symbiotic relationship on defence and trade is an even better one.
It's not even an argument. Imperialism is ridiculous. WN can't even organize effectively at the smallest levels because of infighting.
Let's say that any particular organization even gets close to grasping power of a single state, how would they propose confronting another sovereign nation with the idea?
The Nation is the homogenous people. The Bavarian are not the same is the Rhinelander, let alone the German to the Frenchman.
Race is not color except at the highest/grossest level of that terms usage. Race is cultural, linguiatic, territorial, and specific genetic homogeneity.
The Irishman and the Latvian are both white... but they they are NOT the same. They are racially distinct.
We must include all whites into a singular entity concerning what is being done to us collectively and our collective circumstances today, but we must not surrender our distinct races for some quasi-communistic globization of all whites. That would be terrible.
Better to see a world of white alliance of microstates or large Nations that become NatSoc or Const. Rep.
Imperialism is stupid. If any validity to it exists at all, it is in the rescuing of whites from our current problems through a united military front, then releasing control of territories to the rightful sovereignties, but when has it happened that empire has let go of control when it has it?
Imperialism is communist buzzword. Yes smart white people are not in favor of a white reservation. A race need resources land and power. For better or worse that's what nato is. But not controlled by leftist
The Roman Empire was arguably disastrous for Europeans. Many of the West’s enduring pathologies can be traced back to it. It subjugated Europeans and imposed a conception of citizenship that was purely legal, detached from national and ethnic identity which helped legitimize large-scale foreign settlement within Europe (sounds familiar?). The Empire also progressively easternized the West, eventually relocating its capital outside Europe altogether. The Germanic invasions were, in part salutary. They reintroduced elements of Indo-European martial vigor, masculine ethos, and civilizational energy.
The roman empire always had a racial proto white identity. But yes it wasn't perfect. We have to focus on the future tho. And in the future plenty of the usual white advocates are childless. First step is bringing back big families. I have 5 kids how many you got?
No, it is nor schizophrenic. It is the proper use of language and definitions. Unity doesn't demand we misuse terms. And I said race on its broadcast sense does include all whites, but race can also Mena all.of humanity in an even broader sense, so how about we learn to use language.
Idk why but since trump won Greg you have been very negative toward the right in general. Almost embracing fuentes lvl of "kamala brat". What's the point in crying about striking Kremlin asset Ayatollah? It was good. Same topic about imperialism vs ethno state. The state exists within the empire. Nato is essentially a constellation of white states all under attack from the great replacement. The solution is simple. White euro Atlantic unity with nato military
An excellent article, leading to the right conclusions I think.
White nations (if not our current nation-states) have much in common, but that doesn’t mean we’re prime candidates for an empire dominated by any one of us.
A world of nations is a positive vision; one in which white nations retain full sovereignty, but cooperate in a symbiotic relationship on defence and trade is an even better one.
It's not even an argument. Imperialism is ridiculous. WN can't even organize effectively at the smallest levels because of infighting.
Let's say that any particular organization even gets close to grasping power of a single state, how would they propose confronting another sovereign nation with the idea?
The Nation is the homogenous people. The Bavarian are not the same is the Rhinelander, let alone the German to the Frenchman.
Race is not color except at the highest/grossest level of that terms usage. Race is cultural, linguiatic, territorial, and specific genetic homogeneity.
The Irishman and the Latvian are both white... but they they are NOT the same. They are racially distinct.
We must include all whites into a singular entity concerning what is being done to us collectively and our collective circumstances today, but we must not surrender our distinct races for some quasi-communistic globization of all whites. That would be terrible.
Better to see a world of white alliance of microstates or large Nations that become NatSoc or Const. Rep.
Imperialism is stupid. If any validity to it exists at all, it is in the rescuing of whites from our current problems through a united military front, then releasing control of territories to the rightful sovereignties, but when has it happened that empire has let go of control when it has it?
Latvians and irish are racially distinct? This is schizophrenic isolationism. We need white unity not ethnic isolation
I dont think you read my whole response, or you didn't understand it
Imperialism is communist buzzword. Yes smart white people are not in favor of a white reservation. A race need resources land and power. For better or worse that's what nato is. But not controlled by leftist
The Roman Empire was arguably disastrous for Europeans. Many of the West’s enduring pathologies can be traced back to it. It subjugated Europeans and imposed a conception of citizenship that was purely legal, detached from national and ethnic identity which helped legitimize large-scale foreign settlement within Europe (sounds familiar?). The Empire also progressively easternized the West, eventually relocating its capital outside Europe altogether. The Germanic invasions were, in part salutary. They reintroduced elements of Indo-European martial vigor, masculine ethos, and civilizational energy.
The roman empire always had a racial proto white identity. But yes it wasn't perfect. We have to focus on the future tho. And in the future plenty of the usual white advocates are childless. First step is bringing back big families. I have 5 kids how many you got?
No, it is nor schizophrenic. It is the proper use of language and definitions. Unity doesn't demand we misuse terms. And I said race on its broadcast sense does include all whites, but race can also Mena all.of humanity in an even broader sense, so how about we learn to use language.
Idk why but since trump won Greg you have been very negative toward the right in general. Almost embracing fuentes lvl of "kamala brat". What's the point in crying about striking Kremlin asset Ayatollah? It was good. Same topic about imperialism vs ethno state. The state exists within the empire. Nato is essentially a constellation of white states all under attack from the great replacement. The solution is simple. White euro Atlantic unity with nato military